An Apathetic Nightmare on Elm Street

 

Okay, who is the wiseguy that put sparklers on my finger knives again?

I just watched the 2010 remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street.

Eeeeh, what the hell happened?

I’ll tell ya what, Platinum Dunes.

They really have not figured out that you can’t polish a turd, you might be able to bronze it but that would be about as good as you are going to get.

I don’t get why remakes have been targeted to a younger and hip audience. Don’t they realize as time goes by kids just become even more apathetic and jaded than the last generation? And here is platinum dunes doing the monkey dance trying to get these kids attention and money. That is what this movie looks and feels like, unattached, unemotional and unimaginative as hell. Saw movies look more interesting- and I hate Saw movies.

If they had some vision they would see that marketing the reboot (as it were) to fans would be more to their advantage. Why?

The fans are older and have money to waste on bad films. The “forced reboot” as I call it just doesn’t work for anyone. For a reboot you need to find someone that really likes the original story or movies, not in the way platinum dunes “likes” them (as an investment).

Look at Batman Begins, it’s a reboot but you did not see Nolan trying to re-invent the character or put a modern spin on it, he just built on the character’s back story giving him a reason to be and let nature take its course. The fact that they show what happened to Freddy was a major plus for the movie but would have been better suited as the focal point or at least as a large part of the beginning of the film. For years and years before they made this there has been talk about Freddy’s origin or a movie based on it. The closest they ever came to that was a Freddy’s nightmares episode that showed a bit of the court trial and how he came to be. They missed a great opportunity to show off Haley’s acting chops (sans makeup) and build on the character. It seems like they just said “kids don’t want to wait for Freddy, we need to give them action- skip the origin and show a brief scene at the end to tie it up”. What is even more strange is that these days people WANT origin stories, but it was completely overlooked.

 I got to see an advanced screening of the Friday the 13th reboot and in attendance were Derek Mears (Jason- super nice guy) Brad Fuller (platinum dunes- complete schmuck) and Andrew Form (platinum dunes – Mr. Quiet- seemed like Brad’s bitch).

They went on and on about being fans of all of the movies that they have or will be ruining. Sitting there listening to it all just made me dislike them more, it all sounded like crap. They were talking about bringing a lot of movies to reboot and ANOES was one of them. It was all about how much money they could make. If Friday the 13th does well then we will get the green light on Elm street, and if that does well… I get that studios need to make money but they were very insincere about it and seemed visibly nervous about how people reacted to the Friday reboot, because it kind of sucked. I don’t think they were ready for people not to embrace track star Jason. I liked the chainsaw remake but aside from that they have just consistently put out crap.

And that is what we have with Nightmare 2010, just crap.

I wanted to like it of course. I grew up a Freddy fan, following everything from the movies to the TV series. I understand that over the years Freddy got watered down, and as all good things it had to end. My initial reaction to the Nightmare 2010 news was completely negative, but I had some hopes- Jackie Earl Haley, how could that go wrong?

I don’t know how, but it did… terribly.

They managed to take the dream like quality out of nightmare on Elm Street. Anything clever about any of the old Elm Street movies has been mostly shat upon.

You could tell when the kids were dreaming but there was no sense of danger or weirdness, no surprises. Even though the score “wanted” you to be tense, it just did not happen. I felt like a jaded teenager from today waiting for it to be over.

And speaking of the score, it is the same as the original but the notes are played backwards. No imagination, barely an homage to the original- just modern day slasher movie music.

The most clever part of the score was not really the score actually. In the drug store where Nancy is going in and out of “micro naps” (uuugh) they played the song “All I have to do is Dream” by the Everly Brothers. That was extremely effective in the trailer and really helped to sell the movie. In the actual scene, not so much. It was a good idea but certainly not enough to carry the whole film.

Freddy’s kills were not imaginative by ANY means. He just rips through people now, literally. He tortures kids, also in the literal sense, rather than playing mind games, tricking them or making them face their fears. There are no more morality lessons or ironic deaths. He pulls a kids heart out and as the kid hangs upside down tells him that the brain keeps working 7 minutes after the heart stops, so they had 6 more minutes to play. That is demented but not Freddy. It just sounds like some random serial killer from any crime drama or movie, take your pick.

Aside from that they tried to re-hash gimmicks from the original (and by far still more superior) nightmare, here is the run down.

 

The bed scene 1984: Freddy lurks over Nancy while she sleeps. In the original this was achieved by placing an actor in a false wall behind the bed. A Spandex/Lycra material was used in place of a wall and the actor in good lighting leaned through over Nancy making a very tense scene.

Exibit A

The bed scene 2010: Nancy nods off while sitting up in bed listening to her ipod, because modern day technology not been crammed far enough down our throats in modern movies, “hey, look at my toys… yay!” (Yes, I had a walkman and I am damn proud of it- screw your Ipod!) As Nancy sits there a shiny CG blob Freddy bubbles out of the wall. He might as well have jumped out and started dancing. It looked like someone had used software that came with a demo of the abyss tentacle.

Somebody call Rick O'Connell, I think I see a Mummy.

The tub scene 1984: Nancy falls asleep in tub, Freddy’s hand comes awfully close to her no no bits and just when he stops and she relaxes again he pulls her under the water and she has to swim back out of the drain. The way that the scene played was perfect for a nightmare, girl falls asleep in tub, dreams she is going down the drain and wakes up while under water- makes sense.

 

The tub scene 2010: We have Freddy’s hand come up somewhat close to no no bits as well… then she wakes up. No harm. This was a waste of a perfectly good scare scene. Yes, they might have said “the audience will expect that” but you have to cash in some expectations for your fans.

 

Hallway scene 1984: Nancy sees Tina in a body bag, Tina talks to her and spits up blood. She sees some more gore and runs down the hall only to run into the hall monitor in the Freddy sweater. “Hey Nancy! No running in the hallways!”

 

Hallway scene 2010: Nancy sees Kris in what looks like a thin bag from the dry cleaners calling her name. Woah, that’s really creepy- next!

nothing else. She was micro napping, and immediately the other character explains that to her and they move on. I think I must have been micro napping the entire movie. Maybe not, it might have been better if I had.

 

The infamous Tina bed kill scene 1984: Tina levitates around the room and is brutally murdered in front of her boyfriend. The sounds that Amanda Wyss made in that scene with the gasping and screaming were enough to creep you out, she could act.

The Kris bed kill scene 2010: Though more physical and brutal, the acting did not sell this scene as it did in the original, neither did the CG blood. Just not a good idea.

Quaker oats stairs 1984: Nancy runs from Freddy up the stairs only to be slowed by “quicksand” steps. Great effect even if it was cheesy, er… oaty. A scene to make Wilford Brimley proud.  

Blood hallway 2010: I actually liked this scene, the hallway Nancy is running down slowly turns into a sludgy blood tar pit. Great effect and one of the only good ones in the movie. This scene is actually on the poster, though without the context the poster really just looks like Freddy getting ready to get something naughty from the girl.

The end 1984: Nancy turns her back on Freddy taking his energy away and walks out of the room. The next morning she is going to school. Gets in a car with her dead friends and is presumably driven away by the Freddy mobile as her mother gets yanked back in the house through a very small window by Freddy. Weird ending but it worked. It established that you don’t know what is real or dream in the movie. Did she dream she defeated Freddy and everything is okay or did she dream the whole movie and never really got out of the dream? Who knows.

The end 2010: Freddy is taken into the “real world” hand is cut off and throat slashed, he is left to burn… again- though authorities say there was no body left at the scene. Hmmm…Nancy goes home, turns to talk to her mother as Freddy appears in a mirror and punches through her mom’s face with his gloved hand- and- flash cut to credits with some lame ass EMO new metal band… you know, for kids.

No.

It was if they thought that a Freddy movie was pretty much the same thing as a Jason movie or Leatherface movie. Freddy is not visceral like that, he has a style or at least a more slick approach. This Freddy is like having Jason Voorhees in your nightmare. He is not intuitive or tactful, he just does the matrix quickstep and talks shit.

The one thing I liked about this Freddy was that he flicked his blades like scissors, most likely something that JEH came up with. it was creepy and really cool.

I feel really bad for Haley, he is a great actor and deserves much better than this.

I think platinum dunes needs to stop. Stop raping my childhood, stop looking for the money grab. Yes, I am old and set in my ways. Yes I liked the old ANOES movies up until #5 when Freddy became a carnival barker.

I'll take moonwalking Freddy over 2010 Freddy any day.

Even though the character became a little more annoying each time the movies and the dreams were still dream like. Surreal. It did not just feel like a flashy video director’s demo reel.

But of course they will not stop there, they are now working on reboots of both Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and The Monster Squad.

Someone please kick the Platinum Dunes guys in the nards for me.

My new favorite color

Welcome.

Tonight I want to tell everyone about Red, a film adapted from a DC comics title of the same name. In most cases “comic book” movies = certain doom, however, something happened with this one and it was freaking awesome.

I cannot stop saying how much I enjoyed watching this movie. Not since Grosse Pointe Blank have I enjoyed a contract killer/comedy as much as this one.

Anyone that thinks that Bruce Willis’ action days are over better watch their back because he is a bad ass in this one. With Red Willis also gives us some hope of seeing the real John McClane again- one day.

The plot is pretty easy to follow from the trailers, Retired black ops CIA agents are being assassinated for some reason and Bruce is trying to figure out by who and why, with the help from a few fellow REDs or Retired – Extremely – Dangerous operatives.

John Malkovich plays a crazy, off the grid, paranoid (and for good reason) character to perfection. He is comic relief in the film as well as someone you want on your side in this situation, especially when he has the pig.

Morgan Freeman makes a brief but memorable appearance making you stop to think about how old he really is.

Helen Mirren is also perfect casting, she is what kind of sold me on the movie in the first place…

Wouldn’t you want to see a movie where Helen Murin gets to Rambo up? Of course you do.

Karl Urban plays the agent trying to bring Willis down, he is relentless and perfect. Look for the scene where Willis Meets Urban for the first time, awesome- and the music could not have been better.

I was happy to see Brian Cox as well as none other than Ernest Borgnine with roles in the film as well.

So to move on, there are a lot of great actors in the movie that help prove the comic book stigma does not apply in every situation, they can’t all be bad. I am not sure what the

comic is like or if the fanboys will have a more harsh reaction to it, nor do I really care because for me it was great.

Granted there are a lot of predictable action cues in the movie but it was damn entertaining. The action was fast paced when it needed to be, the twists were well played in every way and above all this movie was funny.

I really just went into this movie after seeing maybe 2 trailers and had no expectations. Needless to say I was very pleased. It did not feel as if anything was missing from the movie, but I do want more. I hope that we get to see more from the RED universe, I hope this movie does well in the box office and gets everything it deserves.

What are you doing still reading this? GO SEE RED!!!

My personal video store

To say that I REALLY like movies would be a complete understatement, in fact I have been a movie fan ever since that cold night in December 1978. The snow was falling outside and I was quite comfortable until the bright lights and all the screaming- I swear someone slapped my ass. I was hosed down, checked out, they wrapped me up like a bean burrito and history was made.
But enough about me…
With my fondness for cinema I developed a nasty collection habit for almost everything movies, props, autographs, posters, toys (or nerd hummels) and of course VHS (skip to the end) DVD. In my years I have built what I believe to be quite a collection of movies, Thanks to the fall of the major rental chains like Blockbuster and Hollywood Video selling off their stock at crazy discount prices.  I will be the first to admit that I have not seen EVERY movie and I cannot quote all classic films verbatim (though there are a few that I can) but I have developed an eclectic taste for movies. I will watch pretty much anything. And while I have seen many, many films I have not seen everything, and that is where this post comes in.

Welcome to:

(Queue Jurassic park theme)

I will be reviewing movies that some may accept as “watchable” and also movies that some may find horrible. I will watch classic movies to comment on pure nostalgia, I will watch shitty movies just because. I welcome any comments, suggestions or requests- though I cannot guarantee that I have every movie requested I do have a Netflix account at my disposal.

So where do we go from here?

Two words…

Ghost Dad
(you bet your Jell-O pudding pops)

I honestly don’t get why everyone hates, hates, HATES this movie so much. I have seen much, much worse.
I do have some theories though.
One thing that struck me from the get go was that this movie was directed by Sidney Poitier, Mr. Tibs!
Bill Cosby is a dad (wait for it) who is struggling with raising three kids without a wife and balancing a big time career (though I don’t think they ever explained what he really did). One day he happens to take the wrong cab, driven by an insane devil worshiper (oh the 80s and their fear of devil worshiping cults) who ends up helping Mr. Cosby become a Ghost.
Through the picture Bill learns that family is more important than business and that if you are a ghost you can choke a fool through a telephone!
Bill finds out that he only has a little time before he is gone for good (flickering blue screen and OBVIOUS wire work included- bonus) with the aid of a British occult expert named Edith (pronounced ED-ith, which is the running gag). Bill struggles to learn how to cope with being non corporeal (at first) and he has to close a big business deal before Thursday (when he passes for good) so he can get life insurance for his kids.
One thing that I found odd was the production value. In the beginning it seemed like a standard 80s comedy, picture was good and they had a Janet Jackson song in the soundtrack which was surprising. But after about 20 minutes you start to notice the rest of the soundtrack sounds like some public domain Sci-Fi score from something like an Ed Wood movie or They. This keeps up occasionally through the movie and was a little distracting. The Blue screen effects (later replaced by green screen in the 90s) were very harsh and quite hilarious. There is nothing quite like Bill Cosby with a flight wire harness flying through the wall. I think as the movie progresses you can actually see the budget plummeting.

Not a horrible movie but I think the main reason that people pick at this one is the WTF ending. There is not really an ending. Out of all the conflicts that were set up in the hour and twenty four minutes not much is ever resolved. I am curious to see if any film schools ever studied this movie, it could have happened.

So overall I don’t think Ghost Dad is quite the horrible movie everyone makes it out to be but it is no Leonard part 6 (more on that later for sure)

Hope you enjoyed the maiden voyage.
Until we meet again.

Trowa

Dear movie industry…

**Warning: This post contains language that may be offensive to some readers, discretion advised.**

redband

Dear movie industry,

Suck it.

I went out this week to purchase some new movies and even though it has been a long time in the making, the movie industry has simply gone too
far.

Why, you ask?

A DVD costs less than $.50 cents to produce- that is by my personal calculations mind you. Most likely it is far less than that even with cover art etc… but more on that later in the post.

It costs on average $19.99 for a DVD. Why? For a while I understood, the DVD had commentary and features and deleted scenes- some even had
blooper reels.  That adds up and I get spending $20 bucks on THAT, however, Slowly it has transitioned to “hey, buy this $22-$24 DVD special edition with a lot of crap”. You buy it and there are two discs, one has the movie and all the “special” crap and the other… is a digital copy of the movie you just bought.
Why?

In this day and age it is easy to watch things on the go and I get that there is an audience for that but why do we have to pay extra for another copy we don’t need just to get special features or the cut of the movie we want? Then they hit the market with 3 disc editions, one disc with the movie, one disc with bonus features- most of them hardly warrant taking up a whole disc (at less than 1G of info at times) and then… a digital copy of the same damn movie you just bought- you know, for friends.

This trend started with the release of Live free or Die Hard. I wanted the “director’s cut” because that version had swearing, I’m sorry but Die Hard without the phrase “Yippey Ki Yay Motherfucker!” is simply not right. In the edit they bleeped the MF with a gunshot, come on people- what happened to R rated action movies? Yes, more sales with PG13 but you drain the life out of it that way. Kids will find out how to get into your movie no matter what the MPAA rates it- they cannot stop everything. But that is another story in itself. (Do yourself a favor and Rent “This film is not yet rated”)

(Bruno no likey)

Now we get DVDs with stickers on them saying “buy bluray and get the most out of your movie”.  These “new DVDs” sport only the feature and MAYBE a commentary if they feel like it.  Seldom do they even have printed artwork on the disc (mostly grey rental discs ready for netflix) and most have stopped even giving you an insert with the track listing. To top it all off they are trying to reduce plastic and they BARELY give you a DVD case that you can safely store your purchase in, because now the “case” has cut outs where the disc sits. You know, so when you drop
the case you have the possiblility for maximum damage to your purchase.  But hey, you can just buy another one right? Money trees are plentiful and fertil- indeed.

The same thing happens to TV DVD sets- IE: The Simpsons. Cardboard sleeves that scratch the hell out of the disc  and hardly do anything to protect. It is not just about flashy packaging- some people want to keep the DVD that they buy longer than a week.

We are a disposable society but some of us still want value for our money.

But they don’t stop with cheap packaging…

Recently, Warner brothers initiated a 28 day hold on their new releases in association with netflix rentals. Their intent is to drive up sales.
They think that if a new release comes out and nobody can easily rent it they will sell more copies of their $20 DVD/ $28 Bluray- and they may be right.
What they fail to realize is that some people, such as myself, rent before buying. I am not going to run out and buy a movie for that price without watching it. So now in a sense they are punishing their customers, forcing them to buy or try to find one of the last physical rental locations to watch their movies.
I had to go to Blockbuster to rent two warner movies. On the receipt it said that I could own the movie if I paid $15 more on one and $17 on the other, after paying $3.50 plus tax for each rental that would make it over $20 per title- no thank you. I enjoyed both films and would like to buy them, however, I will not be buying them now. I will wait and buy them used online for a fraction of the cost. As of now the two titles that I had my eye on are around $10 online and the prices are still droping daily. Once they get around $5 its go time.
They have now forced me to change my habits with watching movies so I must also change my buying habits.

It was also recently announced that Fox and Universal would be doing the same thing. They have perks like an expanded watch it now category but I fail to see how that would do any good- most movies that they are adding are not that good. There are a lot of crap watch it now movies on netflix already, do they need more?

I feel like the studios would do better if they kept their customers in mind and standardized their DVD sales. Sell just the film for $10 DVD/ $15-18 bluray. Then if you want bonus features tack on another $5. If you want a digital copy another $5 and so on. Build your own DVD- Here is what we have available- pick what you want. They could make up any difference in the volume of sales. Plenty of people would buy a single title just to watch the movie for $10- even impulse buyers. Remember VHS? No special features and $15 was okay with everyone. And then the movie geeks can get their extras for a reasonable upcharge. People should not have to convert to HD to get special features. But that is where they are going with it.

Having a choice in what you buy could possibly encourage you to spend more money. As an example I think of the “Special Edition Director’s cut” version of Rob Zombie’s Halloween vs. the ”Theatrical cut”.  I bought the “Special Edition Director’s cut” thinking that I would get both versions of the movie since I paid more, No. There was the feature as Zombie intended and a bonus disc with features. I go to find the “Theatrical cut” which for me was a better version but if I found one in any store it was Full Screen and $25. Never. I ended up tracking a copy down on Ebay for about $10 and when I got it sure enough there was a feature disc which looked like a rental- very cheap. There was also a bonus disc, this one had fancy screen print and- wait a minute- was the same damn disc that was included in the “Director’s Cut”.

The studios should make it possible for you to buy what you want in your DVD, not force you to go find another copy of the film and pay a premium for the version you like but you end up getting another 2 disc set that comes with the version of the film you want but also an exact copy of the special features you already got with the “Director’s cut’. If you get the “Ultimate Edition” it should be “Ultimate”, it should have everything.  I get what happened with Star Wars- Lucas. They are going to keep releasing  multiple “Special Editions” even after he becomes one with the force. They are releasing a BluRay edition of “The Star Wars” pretty soon but if they will have the original version of the trilogy remains to be seen. Most likely they will release the special ones that the die hard fans hate and then a year or so later they will unleash the originals as a bonus like they did with the DVD. But the horrible thing about it is that people keep buying them.

Then there is this…

\”Movie Piracy – It\’s a crime \”

The studios are very protective of their works, and that makes sense but is it that serious of an offense?

At the beginning of each movie we see…

2647538162_75e2703fcf

Here are some interesting facts:
-Misusing a Social Security number: A maximum penalty of five years in federal prison without parole and a fine up to $250,000.

-Tax fraud: maximum penalty of three years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine on each count.

-Pleading guilty to abusive sexual contact:  The maximum penalty upon conviction is three years in prison, a $250,000 fine

So it is okay for the studios to rip off the consumer, but when the tables are turned you are no better than someone that steals identities, cheats on their taxes and abuses others sexually?

I am not saying to download movies online for free, I am saying that this “epidemic” was caused by the movie industry and as one of the options I would like it if we could skip the pity party and focus on the real problem- greedy actors and the studios that give them everything they want.

Studios need to draw the line on salaries. One of their ad campaigns showed a key grip talking about how he had been laid off because there was so much piracy. No sir, you were laid off because Tom Cruise needed another gold plated humvee- thats why.  Tom Cruise was paid for his roles in Valkyrie and Tropic Thunder… 30 million.  Surely they could have paid good old Saul the Key Grip a few thousand dollars for his work. No, if Mr. Cruise does not have his humvee no couch will be safe.

(The only salary that I feel is justified was the one Harrison Ford was paid for Indiana Jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull… 65 Million, for being raped on screen. Should have been more.)

So where do we go from here? I say stop buying all the crap they are selling. If you have to have the movie wait it out a bit and look at the used DVD section- you would be very surprised what other people take back to the store. I have purchased a LOT of DVDs used and most of the discs looked brand new- not even a scratch. If you really like a movie try renting it first, yes they still get money from that but not as much as you buying it from the store. If you want to buy it give it a month or so and you will start to see the price for the used copies drop as more new movies are released. And if you start to feel bad for the actors- don’t. Imagine if you were given 30 Million dollars for 3-4 months of work. Now stop drooling… Think about how Tom Cruise’s stunt man might get paid up to $70,000 in an entire year to do the stunts (wearing a neon green hood that is later digitally replaced by the likeness of Mr. Cruise) that make the movie look cool, and it is hard to do that after Mr. Cruise has worked at the fudge factory all day.   Plus the stunt man has to join a union and pay dues to ensure food is put on the table.

Enjoy your “Super-Mega-Ultimate- Omnipotent-Fancyschmancy- collector’s Edition DVD/BluRays” because pretty soon you will have to buy the 3D version of the movie to get special features, and the 3D TV, and the 3D glasses, and the smell-o-vision card.

But what do I know? I’m just a simple cave man- your evil high definition talking boxes confuse and frighten me.

2229

So again, Movie industry- Kindly Suck it!

Resident Evil 4… thousand

Behold…

Craptastic!

I have been a fan of Resident Evil for many moons. I even attempted to make my own movie and failed fantastically (not because of the script or the lack of motivation- because of dumb, dumb, flaky people).

Wild wild west Alice with annoying Akimbo shotguns.

So the trailer for RE 4 is up and I am completely amazed. Why does Capcom let them do this? Is it just money? Is it really, really funny and I just don’t know? I seriously want to know how they could let something like this go.

I think the movie franchise would have been OK if they had just used a different title other than resident evil and used a different corporation name. Just take the resident evil and umbrella right out- problem pretty much solved.
Those are the only ties to the RE universe and it just drags the name through the mud.
The books are awesome (go read them) and the games were great- of course, but the movies have always left much to desire.

So what if they kept the name and the corporation and continued to let it live in its own universe but didn’t attach well known characters? That is Another way they could have gone about making it, the way they did with the first one. There were no well known characters to piss off the die hard fans but it was faithful to the look and feel of the mythology of the series-it actually added to it and the end was brilliant, that scene where the camera pulls back to the ruined city (sorry but if you have not seen it by now you probably won’t).
Even if they eventually made Alice into a kung fu expert it would not have really hurt the series if they had just stuck with original characters and built around the existing properties, Maybe went with the Evil Alice plan and killed her off (sigh). But they just had to have more well known characters. I think Cameos would have been okay, but having someone as notable as Jill or even Carlos in the second movie without staying true to their character was crap. And then the Nemesis knew kung fu- ubercrap. The nemesis just knew how to kill stars members or other targets- whatever was programmed (even his robot chip would have worked out)- he was a big advanced Frankenstein- not learned in the ways of the deadly arts! I doubt he spent time with Pai Mei, though he was missing one eye…

That is where they jumped the shark.

The first 30 minutes of the second movie were OK but after that mayday!
I really wanted to leave the theater when Alice started jumping around and all the Umbrella people gathered around like a schoolyard fight- But wait… Now the Nemesis has a heart and pushes poor super Alice out of the way of a rocket. I was even ok with the rubber Nemesis suit but Kung- Fu nemesis with manners is just too much.

Looks like the Executioner Majini- but why is it in this movie? Are they in Africa?

The third movie was not so bad if you could get over alice being super and the fact that Claire Redfield had no redeeming qualities whatsoever and was absolutely NOTHING like her character should have been. They almost Made Alice a Terminator-esque character- and that could have worked but fell flat with all the lame wire work. They managed to phone in what could have been a really interesting scene… When they released the “super zombies” (uuugh) they should have done it in the casino. Say the group went to the parking garage to get gas and then got cornered in a casino- that would have let up to the greatest zombie cameo of all time (only to be beaten by Zombieland years later)-

Zombie Wayne Newton.
Picture it… Chills.

The tyrant at the end was pretty lame as well- getting killed with the cube rip off umbrella booby trap- because the first time was not enough and of course we all had to see Milla Jo-Jo-Ba’s eraser nipples for the third time.
Nipples are great but there is a point when you have to leave them behind and work on the story.

Eventually, I actually got to a point where I could accept the three movies, overlooking a lot of the second one, and just hope that one day someone made a really good serious zombie movie (I’m looking at you world war Z, and Frank Darabant with “the walking dead” on AMC- look for it) but after reading a report from the set I am not entirely sure I even want to give this one a chance at all.

Resident Evil: Afterlife | Trailer Park Movies

I just know they are going to turn Wesker into a vampire, watch…

Here is what it said…

“While we’re not exposed to any zombies on this particular day, we’re told that they are evolving too. In fact, there are completely new breeds of zombies, including “burrowing zombies”, which actually aren’t zombies at all, but infected humans. These are nasty bastards who have been living underground and attempting to burrow through concrete, causing their fingernails and lips to be torn to shreds long ago.” http://www.joblo.com/a-visit-to-the-set-of-resident-evil-afterlife

Really?
Mole-men zombies?
I give up.
And they are going with the, “these aren’t zombies they are infected…” If they aren’t zombies give them a name- like they did in resident evil, don’t say “well we have zombies- but not just ANY zombie…”
And don’t even start with the Trinity- er – Alice slow mo crap… Look-at-these-daggars-they-are-flying-right-at-you-oooooohhh-3D-bandwagon-oooohh.

I don’t care if they used the same camera as James Cameron- I might use the same toilet paper but I don’t dream of a world with blue Thundercats re-enacting Dances with wolves with a hint of Pocahontas.
Maybe soon Hollywood will ensure that we will see a REAL 3D turd- then we will get smell-o-vision again and the electric shocks they used in the 50s for “the tingler” to make us all literally shit ourselves in the theater. I guess we will have to wait for Harold and Kumar 3D for that (yes it is coming).

Meh.

But with Paul (if only I could be Wes) Anderson directing expect another ripoff “homage” to the move cubed, again, and again, and again, and again…
Maybe Alice will wake up on a spaceship haunted by ghosts filled with zombies and aliens stalking her and predators stalking the aliens and just when you think she is a goner Jason Statham will show up and they will escape- or will they? Then she almost dies and has a flashback and we see the bazillianth shot of her eyes and she overcomes her impediment, kills the bad guy/monster and blows up the ship only to land at another location where there are now millions upon millions of mole people trying to take her eyes from her. She draws her sword (yes she has one) and Statham draws a gun and just as they are about to chop up some mole men.

Smash cut to the credits and some lame ass slipknot or other generic new age metal band’s music.

And my eyes roll back.

The Legacy of The Dark Knight

Earlier this summer–almost to the year–they finally released The Dark Knight on HBO.

It’s one of those films I’m very particular about. It’s not Batman or Batman II. It’s The Dark Knight. I get sensitive when people are so stuck with their Adam West memories that they mistakenly allow young children to watch it as something to pass the time. I remember once asking an older gentleman what he thought and he dismissively said “ Well, my grandkid liked it. He likes that kid’s stuff.” I don’t think he heard my teeth grinding but I can’t be sure.

Continue reading

How Star Trek Stopped Being the Alternate

There’s a moment in one of my favorite movies, High Fidelity, that seems pretty apropos to my reaction watching JJ Abrams’s Star Trek

John Cusack’s character is the put-upon owner of a record store. Every day these skateboard punks take over the street and basically loiter around his store. Late in the movie, his coworkers listen to a mix tape with stunned disbelief. Cusack takes a listen and, also impressed, asks who it is. Jack Black, in one of those perfect reaction shots, puts his hand up to his face covering his eyes. “Those skateboard bastards out there. It’s…good. It’s really fucking good.”

Continue reading